4 Comments
User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Brilliant breakdown of the founder-VC tension. The part about resource allocation sequencing (Foundation → Acceleration → Innovation → Optionality) really clarifies how to budget without choking future growth. I've seen early-stage teams mess this up by jumping straight to optionality plays before they've nailed the foundationlayer. Treating short-term wins as proof points for the longer vision is kinda the unlock most miss.

Expand full comment
Sharyph's avatar

The founders who really break away treat short-term wins as the required proof points for the longer, more complex vision.

That's the real skill here.

Expand full comment
Sam Illingworth's avatar

Thanks, Chris, for another excellent post. From your experience, what do you think is the best way of fostering a culture of innovation? Often, this is something that most founders have developed over a number of years, but how can they ensure that they support this throughout their employees as well?

Expand full comment
Melanie Goodman's avatar

The pressure to deliver quarterly traction while building something durable and meaningful over 10 years can feel like walking a tightrope in a wind tunnel.

What you’ve nailed here is the need for intentional communication -without it, even great partnerships unravel. A Harvard Business Review study found that 65% of VC-backed startups fail due to founder–investor misalignment, not poor products or markets.

Expand full comment