16 Comments
User's avatar
ToxSec's avatar

“A payback period under six months signals operational excellence and product-market fit. You’re not just acquiring customers — you’re monetising them efficiently.”

Today I learned! Thanks! Great post :)

Chris Tottman's avatar

If you're holding on the customers (net negative churn) and under 6mth CaC then poor of the petrol into CaC 💲📈 LFG

Sharyph's avatar

This isn't just a checklist; it's a structural guide to building a resilient business...Great share, man!

Chris Tottman's avatar

Thanks Sharyph. 🎉

ToxSec's avatar

Hell yeah!

Kamil Tarya's avatar

Thanks for sharing this. It’s helpful seeing how investors interpret the numbers we work with every day

Chris Tottman's avatar

Indeed. I'm glad you liked it 🌞

Karen Spinner's avatar

I found this really interesting as a self-funded developer…I need to care about these metrics, too! 😆

Chris Tottman's avatar

It's widely applicable ✨ glad you liked it Karen 🎉

Karen Spinner's avatar

💯

Neural Foundry's avatar

Terrifc articulation of how fundability has shifted from narrative to numbers. The CAC payback threshhold framing is especialy powerful because it cuts thru the usual 'hypergrowth' fog and exposes what actually matters: how soon your acquistion engines become self funding. It also sidesteps the trap of celebrating vanity metrics like MRR growth without looking at whether you're burning faster than you're earning.

Chris Tottman's avatar

The later the funding stage the more it's financial diligence. You've nailed that for sure

Matteo Turi's avatar

Investors prioritise risk management before they look at revenues.

Revenue growth becomes meaningful when a transferable value is created.

Chris Tottman's avatar

Indeed. Nice and clear

Alfred Griffioen's avatar

I fully agree. Clear metrics for SAAS. It only leaves the question open: how to improve your metrics, because no one has all of them at the max.

Take revenue growth. In order to achieve it, you have to invest in marketing, perhaps setting up local support teams. In which countries are you going to do this, and where not? That depends on the market (size) and your competition.

I strongly believe in making a country-by-country growth plan, perhaps first for just a few countries.

Chris Tottman's avatar

That's right. Find an uncomfortably narrow PMF & GTM - nail that's ie say "no" to most options. Then add another PMF & GTM. Like building blocks. But maximize the ones that are working - this is financing the business 👏 great comments - thanks for sharing your wisdom