Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Abreu Marques's avatar

Amazing post Chris!

Expand full comment
Pawel Brodzinski's avatar

"Let’s say you’re doing $5M ARR. What are you worth?

If you’re growing at 10%, maybe 3x ARR → $15M valuation.

If you’re growing at 50%, you could be worth 10–12x ARR → $50–60M valuation.

If you’re growing at 100%+, and retention is strong? You’re in the 15–20x club.

This is why growth rate matters so much."

A curious side effect of this norm is that founders are pushed hard to show the growth dynamics. The infamous hockey stick growth.

After all, each percent is like another million or so in valuation (to stick with the original numbers). While pumping the growth from 20% to 50% may be beyond reach, playing the numbers so they show a bit more rosy reality at the right time is a piece of cake.

Just look at any corporation pushing for the numbers before the end of a fiscal year (and thus, bonuses).

With startups, it's even more broken because the payout is explicitly non-linear.

So we are designing a game where short-term gains over long-term gains are rewarded. There's no shortage of stories of how that can backfire.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts